WhatCulture.com John Carter Review by Robert Beames: “Lovingly made pulp fantasy……3.5/5”

Other Stuff

Read the full review at WhatCulture.com  “The Inakians are invading Branakha to take the iridianonan back to Nu’cha! Quickly, to the light ship!” This is not a direct quote from Disney’s John Carter – for a start I’ve made up all my own silly fantasy words – but I think it represents faithfully what much of the dialogue sounds like. For long spells of Wall-E director Andrew Stanton’s debut live action film this jargon combines with some elaborate fancy dress costumes to create a world that’s difficult to invest in emotionally, even if it always looks very nice. This isn’t such a problem when we’re watching pretty Earthman John Carter (Taylor Kitsch) beat the hell from a gigantic, albino space ape – but it becomes more incongruous when we get bogged down in the rote love story and earnest father-daughter drama.

Adapted from Edgar Rice Burroughs’ near century old pulp novel A Princess of Mars, Stanton deserves credit for coming at the text with disarming sincerity and obvious love, telling this schlocky sci-fi story without cynicism or a protective barrier of irony. This is perhaps as strong a representation of Burroughs’ story as you could see committed to film, with scantily clad warrior heroes leaping between exotic airships, dispatching blue-blooded beasts with glimmering swords. Yet with inter-character relationships not the book’s (or, as it turns out, the film’s) strongest suit, adapting this text at all seems redundant given that all the best bits have already long since been appropriated by other Hollywood movies.

Since the very first trailers critics have been quick to note superficial similarities to Avatar (white man assimilated by alien tribe), with large dollops of Star Wars (such as the arena scene from Episode II), and even echoes of last year’s dreary Cowboys and Aliens (wandering outlaw Carter wakes up in a dessert with new powers and haunted by backflashes to the wife he could not protect). No doubt these elements stem from the highly influential original novel and have been used here in good faith, yet it’s still difficult to shake the feeling that much of this has been done before. There are a few eye-popping sequences, such as when Carter is chased by a vicious horde of beasties, but these are separated by long and cumbersome dramatic scenes in a film that’s on the wrong side of the two hour mark.

For those not in the know, John Carter is the story of Taylor “he’s so hot right now” Kitsch’s titular hero: a Confederate soldier in 19th century Virginia, transported to Mars (known to the locals as Barsoom) after touching a mysterious, glowing amulet. Once on the red planet he discovers not only that the difference in gravity has increased his strength and agility (meaning he is now potentially a pretty awesome superhero), but that he is not alone. In fact Barsoom is populated by several warring tribes and species. The technologically advanced humanoid Red Men of Zodanga (who live in a cool moving city) and Helium are embroiled in a cataclysmic conflict which threatens to destroy all life on the planet, whilst neither group gets on at all well with the Tharks – one of many primitive tribes of tall, four-limbed Green Martians. Pulling all the strings are a strange group of shape-shifting, teleporting, all-powerful beings called the Holy Therns – glowing blue space monks lead by bad guy du jour Mark Strong.

The film is ultimately about Carter’s Han Solo-esque journey from self-interested nihilist to righteous interplanetary hero, as he goes from seeking a way back to Earth (and his cave o’ gold) to understanding that he can use his new abilities to help save Barsoom and all who dwell there. Like Spider-Man, Carter learns the hard way that “with great power comes great responsibility”. After becoming the unlikely (and reluctant) champion of the Tharks, Carter becomes locked into the battle between the Red Men, bumping into Princess Dejah of Helium (Lynn Collins) and falling for her capable, sassy Princess Leia-esque charms. Dejah is being forced to wed the villainous leader of the Zodangans (Dominic West) by her peace-seeking father (Ciarán Hinds) and this just won’t do. So she looks to persuade Carter to help save her father’s kingdom.

The film is at its most fun when Carter is in the company of the Tharks, who are generally pretty terrific. As a rule, the more Tharks on the screen the better the sequence, with the human characters quite boring by comparison – with charismatic actors like James Purefoy underused. The motion capture of the alien characters is brilliant, getting a lot out of performances from Willem Dafoe,Samantha Morton and Thomas Haden Church without venturing anywhere close to the uncanny valley. The Thark characters are somehow at once stylised and realistic, fitting in with the human characters perfectly and with a very subtle range of expressions. The use of CG is overall pretty stunning and seamless, though Stanton perhaps could have done without the cutesy animal companion character – a staple of animated films that works less well in live action.

Read the Full Review at WhatCulture.com


  • your comment is brilliantly constructed(I’ve re-read this 4X). It seemed, initially, that a lot of the grit and violent spirit had been Disney-fied…it is deeply heartening to hear that it is more fully realized than I anticipated. This will be the longest week in some time 🙂

  • It’s also important to remember this all came before War became so mechanized and impersonal, before machine guns and poison gas and all the rest. Even after the nightmare of the American Civil War we were still using horses and sabers, so it was still easy to romanticize combat.

    There’s a maturity to what Burroughs did, too. I’ve always loved the adult notion that Carter’s most controversially brutal decision (leading the Tharks to butcher and loot all of Zodanga) had consequences throughout later books, rightfully earning him enemies.

    Warlord is not a title earned lightly.

    While the issue of violence in media is a serious one, the greatest swordsman on two worlds always gets a pass in my book.

    I don’t think it’s possible for a John Carter of Mars film to EVER be too violent or gore-drenched, and I am deeply heartened to hear the character was ferocious enough to make the reviewer uncomfortable. That’s actually the best thing I’ve heard from any review so far.

    I was afraid Disney might rob him entirely of his grinning, righteous bloodlust.

  • Of course, can’t expect all reviews to be glowing. Still, not too bad from someone who obviously doesn’t have a great knowledge or love of the source material.
    But, that being said, maybe we can now add “cutesy animal companion character” to the many wondrous things ERB created for us!!

  • Gads! This isn’t reality. It’s fantasy, adventure, living a dream, etc. The stories we grew up with are creative adventures meant to entertain. There is a difference between the movies we watch, and the books we read, and the way we should act in our day to day life. If I watch a movie or read a book and I thoroughly enjoy it, that doesn’t mean I believe in violence. However, there is a line that can be crossed with violence, and sadly a great amount of so called entertainment, in all its forms, crosses that line all too easily. I don’t believe John Carter crosses that line in any way, just good old fashion entertainment! Thanks Andrew Stanton!

  • Thanks for the thorough review. Though mixed, it is still is making me excited to see the movie.

    By the way, according to Stanton, motion capture was only used for the Thark actors’ faces. The Thark bodies were too different from the human actors to be rendered in that manner.

    p.s. “Lead” is a metal, not a verb.

  • Well, having dissed the reviewer I should backtrack a bit and say I have some sympathy for his aversion to the level of violence in ERB — and by extension Stanton. Seemed thrilling and all when I was 12; forty years later it seems at times quite callous. Granted, ERB was portraying a world where life was cheap, but Carter does seem to enjoy himself a bit too much in battle.

    Perhaps that’s why I always preferred Pellucidar: running from danger was always an acceptable option.

  • Reading this reminds me of Rex Reed, a reviewer from a few years back: a fellow who doesn’t seem to like movies all that much.

    He didn’t like Woola? Probably thought “Star Wars” should have ditched R2-D2.

Leave a Reply