Aha! Six Months Later, a Copy of “John Carter Production Notes”

Other Stuff

Well, better late than never.  We never got our hands on a copy of the official John Carter Production Notes from Disney.  For those not all that familiar — “production notes” are a standard part of the official press kit for any movie and contain background on the “making of” the film.  It’s fodder for article writers and sometimes will contain interesting information that is not readily available elsewhere.    I’ve uploaded it so you can click on the link and download it:  John Carter Production Notes.

Here is the section on the Making of John Carter:


Filming of “John Carter” began in the UK on January 4, 2010. With growing public interest and multiple fan-sites speculating on the production’s every move, the bulk of the movie’s stage work (along with exterior sequences set on Earth) were filmed at Shepperton Studios, London and Longcross Studios in Chelburn, over a four-month period.

By late April, the production had moved to Utah for an additional 12-weeks of shooting, with locations in Moab, Lake Powell, the Delta salt flats, Hanksville (where the US space agency, NASA, has tested robotic vehicles), and Big Water—a vast mesa of granulated shale and sandstone set before a towering ring of red cliffs which border the Grand Staircase National Monument.

Although “John Carter” will have a proportion of visual effects, the filmmakers wanted to use real locations and landscapes to film the action.

Producer Jim Morris explains why. “As much as possible, we decided to shoot in actual locations and minimize the amount of digital set creation, so that the audience always feel like they are grounded in real places. We hope this will add an additional layer of authenticity that will heighten the believability and realism of the film.”

“It’s what I call our little slice of Mars,” says Producer Colin Wilson talking about the Utah locations, though ‘little’ might not be the best word to describe a film-set which stretches as far as the eye can see. Using the vast splendor of the natural backdrop (and purpose-built set pieces in the foreground), the ruined remains of a Martian city will be completed digitally in post production. “Our philosophy has been to use practical locations with real sets and set pieces that create a cornerstone for our digital world,” explains Wilson. “The buildings have one level finished here, but in the movie you’ll see towers upon towers.”

On set, however, the blending of traditional filmmaking and computer generated wizardry is truly elevated into an art form as Stanton and his production crew bring the story to life.

For Production Designer Nathan Crowley creating the look of three distinct cultures in the film formed the starting point of the production design. “We are dealing with three main cultures on Barsoom: Zodanga, Helium and the Thark culture. With three different cultures, we needed three different types of architecture. For example, I’ve created what I call ‘ancient modernism,’ and over scaled it for the Thark eight-foot tall creatures. If the modernist architecture of the ’60s had been allowed to go any further, I’ve taken that as an idea from Earth but translated it into oversized Martian versions and then broken the buildings down to create the crumbling cities. That idea developed as we found our real locations because I wanted the natural landscape to form the architecture.”

Costume Designer Mayes C. Rubeo’s biggest inspiration when designing the costumes for “John Carter” was director Andrew Stanton. She explains, “Andrew’s vision is from Barsoom! It is as if he has been to Barsoom and back, and we must try to take all the details from his brain. He has been an incredible collaborator because of how visionary he is and he understands the



© 2012 Walt Disney Pictures





importance of everything I do.”

Working on a movie within the fantasy genre gave Mayes great creative freedom. “I wanted to portray an ancient look but within a science fiction movie, this is a vision that was born 100 years ago by Burroughs. It has to be fantastical with imagination and color.The way the Barsoomians wear the accessories, headdresses or one of the elements of a costume has a very important impact on the film and helps to differentiate the people of these two cities. I did a huge amount of research and we came up with a substantial look for the tribes that is both effective and dramatic.”

Along with the costuming, the process of bringing the characters to life fell to the director and the actors, along with the skills of visual effects masters and makeup wizards to provide them with their individual and tribal characteristics.

For Taylor Kitsch and Lynn Collins, who appear in human form on screen, the process is straightforward, but physically taxing. “It’s the most physical role I’ve ever done,” says Kitsch of John Carter, his heroic character who has been freed from the physical restraints of gravity on Earth. “The jumps, the stunts, the sword training… I mean, almost every scene on Mars, I’m on wires.”

“They’ve hung us every which way,” agrees Lynn Collins, whose character’s princess like qualities are certainly matched by her warrior skills. “After this film, I think my fear of heights has been completely annihilated.”

For the actors playing Stanton’s Martian “Thark” characters, however, the process is more complex. On screen, Willem Dafoe’s Tars Tarkas, for example, will appear as a nine-foot tall alien being with four arms, towering over John Carter. On set, Dafoe replicates the character’s height by performing on stilts. His body is covered in a gray jumpsuit marked with black dots, a reference point for the animators who will recreate his movements digitally in post production. Similarly, his face is also covered with black dots as two cameras, suspended from a helmet, record his facial movements.

“They really just stepped into it,” says Wilson of the cast. “We told all of our Thark characters what we were going to put them through. They walked out of those meetings with Andrew and said, ‘Where do I sign?’ Because I think it’s all about the way those characters are written. It’s a unique thing for them… A unique opportunity to tell a story that’s never been told and create a world that no one’s ever seen before.”

And Director Andrew Stanton is excited to deliver both that untold story and never-been-seen cinematic world—and to deliver that same sense of excitement that first captivated him as a boy. “My goal is to want to believe it,” he says. “To believe it’s really out there. That same feeling you get from any good fantasy book…What would it be like..?”


  • Yet more strangeness, Disney not releasing this with the press pack at the beginning, but waiting 6 months after the film’s release to do so. I continually shake my head over the bizarreness of the mouse house! This info needed to be out there to seed articles and spark discussions. sigh… All I seem to do is shake my head over Disney these days!

  • “Walt Disney Pictures presents the epic, action-adventure film “John Carter,” based on the Edgar Rice Burroughs classic, “A Princess of Mars,” the first novel in Burroughs Barsoom series.

    “2012 marks the 100th anniversary of Burroughs’ character John Carter, the original space hero featured in the series, who has thrilled generations with his adventures on Mars.

    “Over generations, John Carter has become a heroic paradigm across all forms of pop culture. From novels to comic books, artwork to animation, TV and now cinema, the character has inspired some of the most creative minds of the last century.”

    While that is some great information, it would be much, much stronger if it got into specifics. They needed to drop names shamelessly. 😉 Seriously, though, it would have had much more impact if they had specifically mentioned Superman, Star Wars, Avatar, Ray Bradbury, Carl Sagan, Stephen Spielberg, etc., and had included quotes from key figures in the past and present of the book’s influence.

    A LOT of projects attempt to tie themselves into a glorious history of influence, either as a source or a product of such, but few projects can back up the claim the way the Barsoom stories can. It should have been a centerpiece of the marketing. It would have helped establish a culture and a legacy for the film.

    Meanwhile, Disney was too busy thinking that that kind of “old stuff” would do more harm than good. Or perhaps those in charge of the marketing didn’t know or believe the history of ERB’s influence, or thought it would be overshadowed by memories of sometimes-cheesy Tarzan films. The Tarzan films may not have won many academy awards, but they are still VERY famous.

    Perhaps Disney thought the “youth market” wouldn’t care. If so, what about the rest of the market that enjoys learning about “forgotten” treasures and “stories that started them all”?

    After the success of LOTR and it’s approach to marketing an adaptation based on a classic book, why do film studios continue to miss these obvious marketing hooks? Audiences want the impression that the product being sold is substantive, even if they are not yet familiar with that substance.

    Admittedly, the marketing of that substance to those who are not yet familiar with the source material might give some film-goers unintended impressions. Before I saw Fellowship of the Ring, I hadn’t read any of the books and wondered if a university professor’s fantasy world might be overly philosophical and boring. But I still wanted to see the movie, because the marketing had also played up the legacy of the books, and I figured something with that degree of popularity had to have something to it. I was not expecting anything close to the level of imagination and adventure that Middle-earth had in store. The light didn’t click on for me until the battle with the cave troll in Balin’s Tomb, but when it did click on, it was a floodlight. My pleasant surprise with “Fellowship” made me that much more fanatical about the film.

    It seems that Disney was so concerned about the potential negatives of an author-centric marketing campaign that they overlooked what can be overwhelming potential positives.

    The missed opportunity of Disney’s approach is seen in the enthusiastic responses to the “Heritage” trailer and the other trailers similar to it, which are almost universally heralded as “much better” than anything released by Disney.

  • Didn’t Stanton and Disney pretend there was NO fans or sites?

    Seems like their mantra was “we touch NOTHING that is presented to us by an outside source”… There’s plenty of references to the practice of distancing production from the fans. (What, did I just type that??)

    I do find it sad (and I’m really not familiar with the methods of writing production notes or their utilization), but there is no ERB bio; his creds and how he affected 20th century writing. Just brief nods to him as the original author. If they would have treated him the way they did Taylor, Lynn, and the rest of the cast, that would have really been a plus in my mind.

    BTW… I just rented Battleship this weekend. I rather liked it. Another blast across Taylor’s bow that he didn’t deserve… I thought it was a good, fun movie.

  • ” With growing public interest and multiple fan-sites speculating on the production’s every move, the bulk of the movie’s stage work (along with exterior sequences set on Earth) were filmed at Shepperton Studios, London and Longcross Studios in Chelburn, over a four-month period.”

    Wait a minute! “Multiple fan-sites?” Didn’t Stanton and Disney pretend there was NO fans or sites? Wasn’t that Stanton’s excuse for his “mucking” and Disney’s reasoning for ignoring the fans and pretending they were only marketing towards their usual 5-10 year old fan base? Who was writing these notes?

    Also I thought it was funny that there was comments from Colin Wilson since there was to my knowledge no print or video interviews with him. Makes you wonder if he didn’t jump ship after seeing how things were going.

Leave a Reply